Legal Opinion

In the Interest of L.A.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 22, 1993No. 91-2657PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

In this appeal from a delinquency adjudication, appellant, the mother of L.A.D.,1 challenges an order directing her to pay restitution in the event that L.A.D. failed to make such payment, and in ordering her to pay attorney’s fees for services rendered to her son by court-appointed counsel. Upon review of court-ordered supplemental briefs, we conclude that imposition of restitution upon the child, or upon the mother if the child failed to pay, was invalid, and that the error in directing same is fundamental. We therefore vacate the restitution portion of the order as it pertains…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. State v. RhodenSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. State v. BeasleySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. Bull v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kirby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. J.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Mincey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API