Legal Opinion

Stapleton v. Weiderhold (In Re Weiderhold)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 2008No. 1-07-bk-02691PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT N. OPEL, II, Bankruptcy Judge.

OPINION 1

We are asked in this case to decide a question which has been answered differently by bankruptcy courts across the nation. Namely, does it constitute abuse under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(1) and (2) 2 for the chapter 7 debtors to claim vehicle ownership expenses on their unencumbered vehicles? We answer the question in the negative and will deny the United States Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss.

Jurisdiction

The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(a),(b)(1). This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. In Re HardacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  5. Rousey v. JacowaySupreme Court of the United States · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
  2. In Re CoffinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2008
  3. Dehart v. Ponce (In Re Ponce)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API