Legal Opinion
In Re Anderson
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 21, 2008No. 07-33937PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Decision Sustaining in Part, and Overruling in Part, the Objection of eCast Settlement Corporation to the Debtors’ Chapter 13 Plan
GUY R. HUMPHREY, Bankruptcy Judge.
This contested matter is before the court on creditor eCast Settlement Corporation’s (“eCast”) objection to the confirmation of the Debtors’ Chapter 13 plan. eCast’s objection concerns various aspects of the Debtors’ proposed Chapter 13 plan (Doc. 7), as amended (Doc. 22) (collectively as amended the “Plan”), all of which affect how much nonpriority unsecured creditors, such as eCast, should be paid under the Plan. This court has…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Union Bank v. WolasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re JassUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2006
- In Re NockertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
- In Re HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2006
- Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re QuigleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2008
- Dehart v. Lopatka (In Re Lopatka)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- In Re MayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- In Re McCullyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.