Legal Opinion

Rudinsky v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 23, 2012No. 1 CA-CV 11-0663PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Helen Rudinsky appeals the trial court’s partial summary judgment in favor of defendants Ryan Harris, Adam Sachs, and Green Light Real Estate LLC, dismissing Rudinsky’s claim for breach of an oral contract. Because we agree with the trial court that the statute of frauds bars her contract claim, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we view the facts and reasonable inferences from the facts in a light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered. Maycock v. Asilomar Dev., Inc., 207 Ariz. 495, 496, ¶ 2, 88…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Warner v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Weiper v. W.A. Hill & AssociatesOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Zupan v. BlumbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Eagle Technology v. Expander Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. ML Servicing Co. v. ColesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Abbott v. Banner Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. Ed DeWitte Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Financial Associates Midwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  5. Austin v. W. SurpriseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API