State v. Kerwick
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE WALKER, Justice.
I. Introduction
In this State’s appeal, the primary issue we address is whether the trial court abused its discretion by granting Appellee Stacie Michelle Kerwick’s motion to suppress. Based on the standard of review that we are required to apply, we cannot hold that the trial court’s ruling was outside the zone of reasonable disagreement. Accordingly, we will affirm the trial court’s suppression ruling.
II. Factual Background
At around 12:19 a.m., Fort Worth Police Officer Jeffrey J. Bradford was dispatched to a bar on North Main Street in Fort Worth in response to a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Texas v. Kerwick, Stacie MichelleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- State of Texas v. Kerwick, Stacie MichelleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- State of Texas v. Kerwick, Stacie MichelleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- State of Texas v. Kerwick, Stacie MichelleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- State of Texas v. Kerwick, Stacie MichelleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.