Legal Opinion
Terracino v. Gordon and Hiller
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 22, 2010No. AC 29837Published
1Opinion of the Court
1 A.3d 97 (2010)
121 Conn.App. 795
Jerome G. TERRACINO et al.
v.
GORDON AND HILLER et al.
No. 29837.
Appellate Court of Connecticut.
Argued October 27, 2009.
Decided June 22, 2010.
Michael S. Lynch, Shelton, for the appellants (plaintiffs).
Robert W. Cassot, with whom, on the brief, were Cristin E. Sheehan, Hartford, and Kristine R. Jones, for the appellees (defendants).
FLYNN, C.J., and LAVINE and PETERS, Js.[*]
PETERS, J.
This case lies at the intersection of two principles of the law of suretyship. One principle permits a guarantor expressly to waive common-law defenses to his liability for the debt of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connecticut National Bank v. DouglasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Byrd v. Estate of Nelms, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
- Security Insurance v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Lyon v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.