Smith v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Okmulgee county on a charge of larceny of a domestic animal, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.
It is first contended that the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer to the evidence in this case. The defendant claimed that there was an entire failure on the part of the state to prove that the hog sold by the defendant and his codefendant Parks at the town of Morris was the property of Hulsey. Hulsey testified that he had a hog of that kind…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gransden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
- Inman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Munson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Wiley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
- Dorrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- Jennings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Weitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.