United States v. Totaro
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.
In a memorandum of March 19, 1979, 468 F.Supp. 1045, this court held that it had ancillary jurisdiction over a post conviction motion filed in the above captioned criminal case for the return of seized property. The parties were directed to submit affidavits on the subject of the total amount of money seized from the defendant and the ownership or right to possession of such money (Paper 58). Subsequently, defendant (Totaro) and the USA both filed affidavits.
Totaro’s affidavit asserts that at the time of his arrest he had on his person cash in an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Luther R. Wilson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Alfred R. Menkarell v. Bureau of NarcoticsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Everett Alan PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Mayo v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1977
- United States v. TotaroDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Commonwealth v. SaccoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- United States v. BrantDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
- Totaro v. LyonsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- United States v. ProcaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.