Legal Opinion

Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 7, 1992No. C-88-1467 MHPPublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have brought this class action against Lucky Stores, Inc. on behalf of Black and female employees working in retail stores within Lucky’s Northern California Food Division. Plaintiffs allege discrimination on the basis of race and sex in initial job placement, allocation of work hours, reclassification of part-time employees to full-time positions, and promotions. Claims are brought pursuant to Title YII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1981; and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Barefoot v. Sundale Nursing HomeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. William O. Mozee, Gregory L. Rankin, Frederick Williams v. American Commercial Marine Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Hanlon v. ChambersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Thomas Johnson v. Uncle Ben's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. D'AGOSTINO v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API