Legal Opinion
United States v. 93 Court Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 31, 1965No. 509, Docket 29699PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:
The government commenced an action to foreclose a mortgage that secured a note given to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (hereinafter RFC) and moved for the appointment of a receiver. Defendants cross-moved to dismiss on the ground that the government’s action was barred by the running of the Statute of Limitations. In a single order the court below appointed a receiver and denied defendants’ cross-motion to dismiss. Defendants appeal.1
The sole issue before us is whether either a state statute of limitations or the doctrine of laches may be utilized by these…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Campbell v. HaverhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Marcelino Roldan FonsecaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- S.E.R., Jobs for Progress, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Westnau Land Corp. v. U.S. Small Business Administration, as an Agency of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. The City of Palm Beach GardensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.