Legal Opinion

Bollam v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1986No. A8004-02314; CA A27608; SC S32432, S32435PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, P. J.

In an action for damages by insureds against their liability insurer for negligent management of a claim against them, does their cause of action accrue (1) when the insureds are aware that the claim cannot be settled within their policy limits and as a result of the negligence incur attorney fees to protect their own interests, or (2) when they later pay their own funds to the claimant in order to settle the claim? 1 We hold that the cause accrues when they incur attorney fees as a result of the insurer’s negligence.

On January 23, 1975, plaintiffs were involved in a motor vehicle collision…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Jaquith v. FerrisOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Industrial Chrome Platino Co. v. NorthOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hoffman v. ToftOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Niedermeyer v. DusenberyOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kaseberg v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Commercial Union Insurance v. Lewis & RocaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API