Legal Opinion

Niedermeyer v. Dusenbery

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an action for legal malpractice. Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his complaint after the trial court sustained a demurrer thereto which was based upon the statute of limitations.

The facts are assumed to be those alleged in plaintiff’s complaint. In August 1968 defendants represented plaintiff in the sale of plaintiff’s interest in a corporation in which plaintiff received as consideration therefor assets of the corporation. Defendants are alleged to have negligently represented plaintiff in that they failed to secure the proper approval of the directors and stockholders of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Adams v. Oregon State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Aurora, Colorado, and the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado v. Bechtel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. Comley v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Jaquith v. FerrisOregon Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API