Legal Opinion

Healey v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1914No. S.F. No. 6471PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Review directed to the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and to Emmet Seawell, Judge thereof. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An application for a writ of review was made to the district court of appeal for the third appellate-district, and the justices of that court being unable to concur in a judgment, the matter was transferred to this court for hearing and determination.

After a careful examination of the questions involved we have adopted the views expressed by the learned judge of the trial court, written at the time of defendant’s motion to strike out plaintiff’s bill of costs.

‘‘ This action was commenced in the justice’s court of Santa Rosa township, where judgment went for defendants. An appeal was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AmdurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in Riverside CountyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1946
  3. Applied Materials, Inc. v. Demaray LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. Swasey v. Seterus, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Ticey v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API