Murphy v. Casey
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Butte County refusing to strike out a cost bill. John C. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiff brought this action on June 12, 1909, to recover the sum of $482, an alleged balance due for board and lodging furnished to certain employees of defendant and for a certain quantity of corn sold and delivered to said defendant by plaintiff.
The defendant answered the complaint in due time, and the cause was set down for trial for December 21, 1909.
On the twentieth day of December, 1909, the defendant served a written offer on the plaintiff to allow judgment to be taken for the sum of $200. This offer was filed on the twenty-first day of December, 1909, and on the same day the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Johnson v. SagarNew York Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Healey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Joseph Magnin Co. v. SchmidtAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1978
- McArthur v. John McArthur Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919