Legal Opinion
Leisure v. City of Cincinnati
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 6, 2003No. C-l-01-286PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, Motion to Strike, Motion for More Definite Statement and Memorandum in Support (doc. 46), Defendants’ Supplement (doc. 47), Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition and Motion for Continuance to Permit Discovery Pursuant to Rule 56(f) (doc. 48), and Defendants’ Reply and Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Continuance (doc. 49). I. Background
The Court reports the facts of this case based on a review of the allegations in the Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (doc.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kammeyer v. City of SharonvilleDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003