Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Hasselman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1907No. Gen. No. 12,872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in assumpsit. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Lockwood Honore, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Freeman

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is urged in behalf of plaintiff in error that where the body or signature of the instrument discloses the principal, the agent is not bound, that there is no specific form in which commercial paper must be signed by a corporation, that the use of the word “we” applies as well to a corporation as to individuals, and that the use of the words “per” or “by”. is not necessary to indicate agency. On the other hand defendant in error contends the note upon its face shows a prima facie joint liability on the part of the William C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scanlan v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. New Market Savings Bank v. GilletIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Williams v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. McNeil v. Shober & Carqueville Lithographing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Williams v. Miami Powder Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tampa Investment & Securities Co. v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  2. Greenlee v. BeaverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  3. Decowski v. GrabarskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  4. Kaspar American State Bank v. Oul Homestead Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  5. Ruwisch v. TheisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API