Legal Opinion

Scanlan v. Keith

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1882PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

On the 2d day of August, 1873, John Scanlan commenced this suit against Samuel L. Keith. The action is assumpsit, and originally the declaration contained only the common counts, to which defendant filed the plea of non-assumpsit. Afterwards, on the 5th day of January, 1880, plaintiff, by leave of court, amended his declaration by adding a count on a promissory note, alleged to have been made by defendant jointly with one W. H. Kretzinger. To the additional count defendant pleaded non-assumpsit, verified by affidavit, and also a special plea; but to the special plea a demurrer was sustained,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powers v. BriggsIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Hypes v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. New Market Savings Bank v. GilletIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Liebscher v. KrausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Frankland v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Second National Bank v. Midland Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Heffner v. BrownellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Barkhausen v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API