Decowski v. Grabarski
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago, the Hon. Feed L. Fake, Jr., Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely
The question for our determination is whether or not the defendants, individually, are obligated by the note in question. From an examination of the record we find that the word “we” appearing in the note was inserted after its maturity, but by whom is not shown. However, we do not deem this to be important. The use of the word “we” in this connection indicates nothing as to whether the note was intended to be the obligation of the individuals or of the corporation. New Market Sav. Bank v. Gillet, 100 Ill. 254.
Examination of the decisions in the reported cases cited by respective counsel does…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scanlan v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Powers v. BriggsIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Hypes v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- Keidan v. WinegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- New Market Savings Bank v. GilletIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tampa Investment & Securities Co. v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
- Kaspar American State Bank v. Oul Homestead Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939