Legal Opinion

Vincen v. Lazarus

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1969No. 10277Published

1Opinion of the Court

456 P.2d 789 (1969)

93 Idaho 145

David VINCEN and Pamela Vincen, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

Michael E. LAZARUS, Defendant-Appellant.

Glenn J. RHODES, Jr., Arthur McKay, Rex W. McKay and Lloyd McKay, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

Michael E. LAZARUS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10277.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July 3, 1969.

Furchner & Anderson, Blackfoot, for appellant.

Clemons, Skiles & Green, Boise, for appellees.

McQUADE, Justice.

This opinion treats together two actions which were consolidated for disposition, since they both arose out of the same accident. During the late afternoon of July 23,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. VordenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Home Indemnity Co. v. Reynolds & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. KraftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. Otts v. BroughIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Bell v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API