Legal Opinion

Strimling v. Union Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1928No. 26,925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment.

Plaintiff purchased a note secured by a second mortgage upon real estate in Minneapolis. The mortgage was subject to a prior mortgage on which there Avas an unpaid balance of some $72,000. A large building Avas being erected upon the property, and lienable claims existed and would arise from the building operations. . As a protection and further security for plaintiff’s mortgage, the defendant had issued to the holder thereof its indemnity bond, conditioned that the defendant Avould Avell and truly pay or cause to be paid all claims for labor…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Camden v. MayhewSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Loeb v. SternIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. American Building & Loan Ass'n v. WaleenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Barron v. MullinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  5. Freeman Appeal from Doings of CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. State v. SchobergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Morin v. HoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
  4. In Re Estate of NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Danielski v. Pioneer Building Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API