Legal Opinion

Morin v. Hood

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 6, 1951No. 3983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

The defendant having proceeded with the introduction of evidence after the denial of his motion for a nonsuit, the question before us on his exception is whether upon the whole case there was evidence to sustain the verdict for the plaintiff. Lane v. Manchester Mills, 75 N. H. 102, 106; Leonard v. Manchester, ante, 115, 117. We think there was.

The plaintiff as mortgagee under this recorded mortgage had sufficient legal interest in the fixtures covered thereby to maintain an action for conversion against any one who sold them without his consent. Knapp v. Hobbs, 50 N. H. 476; Cf. Munsey v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Exchange State Bank v. Occident Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Strimling v. Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Sandy Sommerville, Trading and Doing Business Under the Name and Style, New Wilmington Livestock AuctionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  2. STATE SECURITIES COMPANY v. SvobodaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kenerson v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Kenerson v. Morgan Guaranty TrustDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
  5. STATE SECURITIES COMPANY v. SvobodaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API