Legal Opinion

Dendy v. Russell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1911No. 16,952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Miami district court.

1Opinion of the Court

*378The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The appellees recovered a judgment against the appellant in a suit in the district court of Miami county upon the covenants of warranty of title in a bill of sale of seventy-one steers. The bill of sale was in writing, and was executed on February 14,1900. At that time the First National Bank of Cobleskill, New York, held a chattel mortgage on the steers, and subsequently recovered them from the appellees in a suit in the district court of Reno county. The judgment in that case was affirmed. (Dendy v. Bank, 76 Kan. 301.) After the decision…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dendy v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Dendy v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. John Deere Plow Co. v. SpatzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Lake v. HargisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Hutchinson v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Geijsbeek v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Bankers Investment Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Geijsbeek v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API