Legal Opinion

Lake v. Hargis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1910No. 16,578PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Barber district court; Preston B. Gillett, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

GRAVES, J.:

This is an action upon an ordinary replevin bond, given at the coihmencement of an action of replevin before a justice of the peace. Riley Lake had in his possession a hog which A. J. Hargis claimed to own. Lake refused to surrender the hog and Hargis commenced an action of replevin before a justice of the peace to recover possession of it. Lake gave a redeliv*712ery bond and retained possession of the animal. The trial was had before a jury and the verdict was in favor of Lake, who was adjudged to be the owner and entitled to the possession of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winstead v. HulmeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Citizens' State Bank v. MorseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. John Deere Plow Co. v. SpatzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dendy v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Geijsbeek v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Bankers Investment Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Geijsbeek v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API