Legal Opinion

Dendy v. Russell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1903No. 13,170PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Miami district court; John T. Burris, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Dendy & Peck bought certain cattle of Paul Russell, who warranted the title. The First National Bank of Cobleskill, New York, claimed the cattle under a mortgage and brought replevin for them against Dendy & Peck in the district court of Reno county, getting possession under an order of delivery. Dendy & Peck notified Russell of the action and defended against it. The bank recovered judgment. Thereupon Dendy & Peck brought the present action against Russell upon his warranty. Russell bases his defense upon a contract which he alleges' was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barnes v. GraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Powell v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  2. Combined Metals, Inc. v. BastianUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Reed v. Kansas Postal Telegraph & Cable Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Snuffer v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Caldwell v. McKennaIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API