Legal Opinion

Croom v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1929No. 6567PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

One of the judgments against which the complainant in the equitable petition seeks injunction was a judgment rendered by default in the city court of Macon. No fraud in the procurement of this judgment is shown by the allegations in the petition. Under the decision in the case of Grady v. Information Buying Co., ante, 175, the petitioner was not entitled to an injunction to restrain the enforcement of this judgment.

But under the allegations in the petition, the petitioner does show fraud in the procurement of the so-called confession of judgment and the judgment based on the alleged…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. HairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Henry & Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Hutchings v. RoquemoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API