Legal Opinion

Abercrombie v. Hair

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 8, 1938No. 11978PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

The motion to dismiss the writ of error, on the ground that all of the questions raised are now moot, must *731be denied. Although it appears from the motion to dismiss and the answer thereto that substantially all of such questions, arising from the dismissal on general demurrer of the petition to the superior court of heirs at law for an injunction and other relief against an executor and the ordinary, also have been raised by appeals of these heirs from an adverse. decision of the court of ordinary to such superior court, the mere pendency of the appeals, undisposed of, does…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Poullain v. PoullainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. Neal v. BoykinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Hooks v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Trustees of the University of Georgia v. DenmarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Henderson v. McVaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Benton v. TurkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Bowers v. DolanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Beavers v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. McClure v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API