Legal Opinion

Hutchings v. Roquemore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1930No. 7685PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

1. A judgment obtained in a court in this State will not be set aside and declared to be of no effect, although the same was obtained and entered up in consequence of corrupt and wilful perjury, unless the person charged with such perjury shall have been thereof duly convicted, and unless it shall appear to the court that such judgment could not have been obtained and entered up without the evidence of such perjured person. Civil Code (1910), § 5961; Richardson v. Roberts, 25 Ga. 671; Griffin v. Sketoe, 30 Ga. 300; Munroe v. Moody, 78 Ga. 127 (2 S. E. 688); Barfield v. Birrick, 151 Ga. 618,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barfield v. BirrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Griffin v. SketoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  3. Munro v. Moody & FrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Richardson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  5. Croom v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hurt Building Inc. v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Morris Plan Bank of Georgia v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Hubbard v. WhatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Poole v. McEntireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Bird v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API