Legal Opinion

Dugan v. M & W Dozing & Trucking, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 22, 1989No. 89 C 6048PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

The plaintiffs William E. Dugan, et al., have brought this action against M & W Dozing and Trucking (“MW”) seeking relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132, 1145. MW has filed a motion to transfer the matter to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). 1 For the reasons set forth below, we deny this motion.

The plaintiffs are the trustees of multiemployer fringe benefit funds. The trustees claim that MW was obligated to contribute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hess v. GrayDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  2. General Accident Insurance v. Travelers Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  3. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. SloanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flynn v. Veazey Construction Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  2. Jacobson v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Trustees of the Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union Welfare Pension Fund v. Amivest Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  4. International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Painting Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Jean v. DuganDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API