Legal Opinion
Moy v. Bell
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 15, 1980No. 1499, September Term, 1979PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLowe, J.
In Goldstein v. Potomac Elec. Power Co., 285 Md. 673 (1979), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit asked the Maryland Court of Appeals to explain the effect of the statute of limitations (Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. Art., § 5-101) upon a suit for damages caused by a nuisance. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County asks us to explain that explanation.
A number of building lots in a subdivision in Anne Arundel County were established upon very low, poorly drained land. Since 1966 appellant has owned one of these sites which had been improved with a house…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Waldman v. RohrbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Isen v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Goldstein v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Turner v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- O'HARA v. KovensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Decker v. FinkCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Lutheran Hospital v. LevyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Jacques v. Pioneer Plastics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Artra Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.