Pipe v. Leese Tool & Die Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blair Moody, Jr., J.
We granted leave in this case to consider two questions:
1) Whether the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board or the Court of Appeals correctly applied the standards set forth in Hutsko v Chrysler Corp, 381 Mich 99; 158 NW2d 874 (1968), and in Mitchell v Metal Assemblies, Inc, 379 Mich 368; 151 NW2d 818 (1967), in this matter, and
2) Whether this Court should adopt a different standard and, if so, whether the plaintiff would qualify under such a standard.
We conclude that (1) the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board correctly applied the Mitchell and the properly interpreted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hutsko v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Travelers Insurance Company v. SeaboltTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Lovalo v. Michigan Stamping Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Rench v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Hlady v. Wolverine Bolt CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Scott M Cain v. Waste Management IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Kidd v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Howard v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Tew v. Hillsdale Tool & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Cain v. Waste Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.