Legal Opinion

Hamman v. H. J. McMullen & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1933No. 5946PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

For a comprehensive statement of the case and issues to be determined, we quote the following from the opinion of the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals:

“Appellee, Henry Hammann,. on September 14, 1929, instituted this suit against Arthur E. Smith and wife, Myrtle Mae Smith, to recover the balance due on a promissory note dated July 17, 1919, in the principal sum of $2,200, with interest from *479date at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum and for 10 per Cent, additional on the amount due as attorney’s fees. Said, note was by its terms payable in monthly installments of $15 each, together with all…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thomas Trammell & Co. v. MountTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. D. Sullivan & Co. v. Texas Briquette & Coal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Texas Bitulithic Co. v. WarwickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. McIlhenny, Admr., and U. T. Co. v. BinzTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Galveston Exhibition Association v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. First National Bank in Dallas v. Whirlpool Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Swoboda v. Wilshire Credit Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  4. Crumley v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Callan v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API