Legal Opinion
Hamman v. H. J. McMullen & Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1933No. 5946PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson
For a comprehensive statement of the case and issues to be determined, we quote the following from the opinion of the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals:
“Appellee, Henry Hammann,. on September 14, 1929, instituted this suit against Arthur E. Smith and wife, Myrtle Mae Smith, to recover the balance due on a promissory note dated July 17, 1919, in the principal sum of $2,200, with interest from *479date at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum and for 10 per Cent, additional on the amount due as attorney’s fees. Said, note was by its terms payable in monthly installments of $15 each, together with all…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thomas Trammell & Co. v. MountTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- D. Sullivan & Co. v. Texas Briquette & Coal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
- Texas Bitulithic Co. v. WarwickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- McIlhenny, Admr., and U. T. Co. v. BinzTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Galveston Exhibition Association v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- First National Bank in Dallas v. Whirlpool Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
- Swoboda v. Wilshire Credit Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Crumley v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Callan v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.