Legal Opinion

Bougas v. Eschbach-Bruce Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1914No. 11462PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Grady, J., entered April 10, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, for personal injuries sustained by a pit man in steam shovel work.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This action is founded on the alleged negligence of the defendant in failing to use reasonable care in repairing a clamp key. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

The appellant was operating a steam shovel, in Umatilla county, in the state of Oregon, at the time respondent sustained the injury complained of. The respondent was in its employ as one of the pit men. His particular duties were to attach an iron or steel clamp to the steel rail of the track upon which the car containing the steam shovel was operated, and to remove it when the car eased off for the purpose…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martin v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  2. Johnson v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Stork v. Charles Stolper Cooperage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Borden v. Daisy Roller Mill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Vanderpool v. PartridgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mattson v. Griffin Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Paich v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Etel v. GrubbWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Arneson v. Grant Smith & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Stevens v. HinesWashington Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API