Legal Opinion

Etel v. Grubb

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1930No. 22208. En BancPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Defendants are the owners of an orchard in Yakima county, and, during the fall of 1928, plaintiff was employed by them as a fruit picker. Early in October, plaintiff, then being engaged in picking apples from trees running from twelve to over twenty feet in height, required a ladder to enable him to reach the apples on the higher branches of the tree from which he was then picking. There being a group of four stepladders, the property of defendants, standing nearby, where they had been placed, presumably for use by the fruit pickers, plaintiff selected a ladder about ten feet in height and,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cahill v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Colonna Shipyard v. DunnSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  3. Cole v. Spokane Gas & Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Arneson v. Grant Smith & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Bougas v. Eschbach-Bruce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rose Wong and Kent Wong v. Walter Swier and Laura SwierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. Rosendahl v. Lesourd Methodist ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Olson v. Kem Temple, Ancient Arabic OrderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Finch v. W. R. Roach Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Finch v. W. R. Roach Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API