Legal Opinion

In Re Bathurst

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1928No. Docket No. 1724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

This is an application of Benjamin Elconin on behalf of Diana Bathurst for the writ of habeas corpus. From the petition, the return thereto, and the findings of this court upon evidence taken, we may state the following situation: Diana Bathurst was tried upon a charge of petty theft before the municipal court of Los Angeles on July 9, 1928, and there found guilty. The trial court on July 11th sentenced the defendant to 180 days in the city jail, suspending the sentence as to 150 days thereof. The petitioner contends that he presented a motion for a new trial prior to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eisenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Parkside Realty Co. v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. People v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Garrett v. Superior Court of Kern Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keaton v. Mun. Court of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. In Re BathurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Maslan v. PierceWashington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API