Legal Opinion

Umpqua Bank v. Charles A. Gunzel III and Ginelle F. Gunzel

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 25, 2021No. 37400-9Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILED MARCH 25, 2021 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE UMPQUA BANK, ) ) No. 37400-9-III Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) PUBLISHED OPINION CHARLES A. GUNZEL, III, and ) GINELLE F. GUNZEL, husband and ) wife, ) ) Appellant. ) FEARING, J. — In an appeal wherein we apply Oregon law, the parties ask us to determine when a cause of action accrued, for purposes of the statute of limitations, against a guarantor of a commercial loan when the commercial borrower defaulted but made periodic payments…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. John J. Kassner & Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff v. James H. Petersen, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Ross v. RossArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Sand Lake Lounge, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API