Moore v. Livingston
New York Supreme Court
Motion by plaintiff, after trial by the court, for judgment or decree, restoring to him a reconveyance of real estate, &c.
1Opinion of the Court
Roosevelt, Justice.
In examining this case, I have felt myself compelled, by the evidence, to regard it as a controversy between Livingston and Moore exclusively. The successive wives of the former, whose names have been introduced *3into the transaction, appear, for reasons which I shall hereafter explain, to be, and to have been throughout, merely nominal parties.
The suit, in its consequences, involves the title of a valuable property in Broadway and Cortlandt streets, which, it is conceded, at one time belonged to the plaintiff, Dr. Moore, but which (having put it out of his hands to defeat…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Lockren v. RustanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Seagirt Realty Corp. v. ChazanofNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Cirillo v. CirilloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1950
- Keel v. LarkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Hubbard v. United Wireless Telegraph Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.