Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. United Wireless Telegraph Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1909Published

Demurrer by the defendant United Wireless Company to the complaint upon the points: First. That the court has not jurisdiction of the subject of the action, and Second. That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

This is a judgment creditor’s action in aid of an execution, brought for the purpose of having an alleged fraudulent transfer of property by the defendant American De Forest Wireless Telegraph Company, the judgment debtor, to the defendant United Wireless Telegraph Company adjudged void, a receiver appointed, and the property thus transferred applied to the payment of plaintiff’s judgment. The defendant United Wireless Telegraph Company demurs to the complaint upon the grounds that the court has not jurisdiction of the subject of the action, and that the complaint does not state facts…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southard v. . BennerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Bartlett v. . DrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Osborne v. MossNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  4. Phillips v. . WoosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Moore v. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1857

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API