Fisher v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtSidney Squire, J.
The defendant- moves to dismiss the amended claim herein because said pleading does not sejt forth a cause of action against the defendant.
Claimant’s first pleading, his claim, had been dismissed (20 Mise 2d 818) with permission to serve an amended pleading, now under attack, The factual background of claimant’s unfortunate predicament is set forth in said, opinion,
*936The gravamen of claimant’s cause of action, as alleged in this second pleading, is that certain ‘ ‘ false, misleading and incompetent evidence was intentionally and maliciously assembled and presented by representatives of The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ritter v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- Drake v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Zimmerman v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Fonfa v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976
- Fisher v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Jacobson v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.