Legal Opinion
Drake v. City of Rochester
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1978PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Elizabeth W. Pine, J.
Defendant County of Monroe (county) moves, in two companion cases argued together, to dismiss both actions on the grounds that (1) this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 2); (2) both actions are barred by the Statute of Limitations (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 5); and (3) the complaints fail to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 7). Defendant county also moves for summary judgment against plaintiffs (CPLR 3212).
Defendant City of Rochester (city) cross-moves to dismiss the complaint (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. FranklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Cohn v. Lionel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Seibel v. KembleHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Rodney Taylor v. Thomas Mayone, Sheriff of Ulster County, Deputy John Doe and Sergeant John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Rodrigues v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- HAYFOOD v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Claude H. v. County of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.