Ritter v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the State from an order granting leave to file a claim against the State pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act. If the proposed claim does not state a valid cause of action the motion should not have been granted. (Siegel v. State of New York, 262 App. Div. 388.) Claimant seeks to recover the sum of $300, the alleged value of a ring stolen from claimant, and lost while in the custody of an assistant district attorney of the County of New York. The ring was held as evidence in connection with the prosecution of the thief. After the disposition of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Siegel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Fishbein v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Ritter v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kelley v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Fisher v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Drake v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Williams v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Davis Construction Corp. v. County of SuffolkNew York Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.