Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Heinen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 29, 2002No. S.C.B.D. 4757. No. O.B.A.D. 1521PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSummers, J.
¶ 1 Respondent was licensed to practice law in the State of Texas. In that State a proceeding to impose professional discipline was commenced, and he later requested that Supreme Court of Texas accept his resignation as attorney and counselor at law. The Texas court accepted the resignation. In the Matter of Timothy William Heinen, Misc. Docket No. 01-9044, (Texas Sup.Ct., March 22, 2001).
¶2 The Oklahoma Bar Association filed an application with this Court to impose professional discipline upon Respondent because of his resignation pending discipline in Texas. We issued an order to Respondent…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. AuldTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Dickason v. DickasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Kirkpatrick v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- In Re the Reinstatement of FraleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. WINTORYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HYDESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. GAINESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.