Legal Opinion

In Re the Reinstatement of Fraley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 2005No. SCBD 4834PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.

¶ 1 In this application for reinstatement to membership in the Oklahoma Bar Association the issues to be decided are: (1) Is the record1 sufficient for our meaningful de novo consideration of the application? and (2) Did applicant establish the prerequisites and meet his burden of proof of showing by clear and convincing evidence that his reinstatement is justified? We answer both questions in the negative.

¶ 2 This is an unusual and complicated reinstatement matter because applicant, Jerry Fraley’s, resignation did not comply with requirements of the governing rules. On December 18, 1997, Mr.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Matter of Reinstatement of KaminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SamaraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. In re Reinstatement of KerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  4. In Re the Reinstatement of MunsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. In Re the Reinstatement of MuminaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API