Legal Opinion
Glair v. Butts
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 2001No. 00-56682; D.C. No. CV-99-10835-MLRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Richard J. Glair appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for defen*783dants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Glair alleged Cabrera violated his First, Fourth, and Sixth Amendment rights by behaving in an inappropriately aggressive manner during and after a traffic stop and by failing to provide Glair with adequate notice of the traffic violation with which he was charged. Glair alleged that Butts was liable, based on the same constitutional violations, because he failed to properly train police officers. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- LSO, Ltd. v. StrohCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Defenders of Wildlife Southwest Center for Biological Diversity v. Mike Bernal Robert Smith, Dr.,superintendent BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jensen v. City of OxnardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Glair v. ButtsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003