Legal Opinion
Glair v. Butts
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 2003No. 01-57219Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Richard J. Glair appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1985 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment, Rutledge v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 859 F.2d 732, 734 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm.
Glair alleged that police officials Butts and Centeno violated his constitutional rights by conspiring to intimidate witnesses in an earlier federal action filed by Glair. The district court properly concluded that Glair failed to establish any triable issue of material fact…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kevin Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, Arizona State University, and Gary Horton, an Individual and Frank Kush, an Individual, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Glair v. ButtsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001