Legal Opinion

Holt v. Reagan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1941No. 4-6230PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellees owned a lot, of irregular shape, containing 1.71 acres, in the town of Rector, which was not a part of the town as originally surveyed and platted. For many years it was described on the tax books as “Part 'South Half Northwest Quarter Section 23, T. 19 N., R. 7 E.,” and the taxes were assessed and paid under that description. None of the owners of the land lived in Rector, and the owner, Miss Vestal Wood who paid the taxes, resided in El Dorado. There had been a forfeiture and sale to the state through failure to pay the taxes when due, and a redemption was effected through…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hirsch and Schuman v. Dabbs and MivelazSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Knauff v. National Cooperage & Woodenware Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Redfern v. DaltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Sub-District No. 1 of Drainage District No. 11Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lumsden v. ErstineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Burbridge v. Bradley Lumber Co. of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. Bracken v. HensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Burbridge v. Bradley Lumber Co. of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Newton, Cir. Clk. v. American Security CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API