Legal Opinion

Luis Coppa & Son v. Kuiper

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 23, 1970No. 23439PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves

The plaintiffs in error, called the petitioners, applied to a water division engineer for a change in administrative *317practice. Some of the defendants in error were protestants in the proceeding. The application was denied and an appeal was taken to the State Engineer who sustained the division engineer. A writ in the nature of certiorari was sued out in the district court under R.C.P. Colo. 106. The court declined to grant the requested relief and the matter is here on writ of error. We affirm.

Water District No. 18 was created by statute in 1885, embracing all or portions of Bent and Las…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marker v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Huerfano Valley Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Kibbee v. KostelicSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. South Adams County Water & Sanitation District v. Broe Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. North Sterling Irrigation District v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API