Huerfano Valley Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. Hinderlider
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
The controversy set forth in the amended complaint is .nominally between private corporations and individuals, owners of lands and irrigating systems and their decreed appropriations of water, all of which are situate in Pueblo county in water district No. 16, and the headgates of their ditches that divert water from the Huerfano river have their headgates in that county. These parties are the plaintiffs. The defendants are Mr. Hinderlider, as state engineer of Colorado, and his subordinate officers of the water district with whom are joined as codefendants corporation and individual owners…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nichols v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Wadsworth Ditch Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Crippen v. X. Y. Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- Field v. KincaidSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Broad Run Investment Co. v. Deuel & Snyder Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- United States v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Shirola v. Turkey Cañon Ranch Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Laramie Irrigation & Power Co. v. GrantWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- South Adams County Water & Sanitation District v. Broe Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.