Legal Opinion

Marker v. City of Colorado Springs

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 2, 1959No. 18643PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Knauss

We shall refer to the parties to this writ of error as they appeared in the trial court, where plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs and defendants in error were defendants.

Pursuant to Rule 106, R.C.P. Colo., plaintiffs sought review of the action of the defendant City of Colorado Springs, Colorado, in granting a use variance permit to defendants in error Service and Vanderhoof to erect a medical office building on certain unimproved lots owned by them with office space for eight doctors. The property involved was zoned R-3, under which the lots were limited by the zoning ordinance to one and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Civil Service Commission v. HazlettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ford Leasing Development Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. O'DellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Sundance Hills Homeowners Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API