Legal Opinion
Adams v. Clifford
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided January 7, 1969No. Civ. No. 2878PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
PENCE, Chief Judge.
This action was brought by 283 members of the United States Army Reserve who had enlisted therein prior to October 1966, and who, in April-May 1968, were ordered and entered into active duty. All are now in the 29th Infantry Brigade, United States Army, and stationed in Hawaii, allegedly against their will and without their consent. The named defendants are the Honorable Clark Clifford, Secretary of Defense, and other Secretaries, Generals, commanding officers, etc., and the United States.
Upon enlistment, each plaintiff signed an enlistment contract entitled…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Winters v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Morse v. BoswellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- James E. Dix v. A. P. Rollins, Jr., Maj. Gen., U. S. A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Schwartz v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Hoersch v. FroehlkeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Bruce v. United States ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.