Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Franklin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1969No. 23265PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOLOMON, District Judge:

Louis R. Schwartz appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus from the United States Army. The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U. S.C. § 2241. Hammond v. Lenfest, 398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir.1968). Our jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

Schwartz enlisted in the Army Reserves in September, 1965. He signed a contract which said:

“If in any year I fail to perform satisfactorily any of the requirements set forth above, I can be ordered to perform active duty for training for a maximum of 45 days or be reported to *738Selective Service for immediate induction.”

O…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. RobelSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Richard D. Glazier v. Capt. James G. Hackel, Company CommanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. Mickey v. BarclayDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Karpinski v. ResorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. Mellinger v. LairdDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Silverthorne v. LairdDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API