Schwartz v. Franklin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SOLOMON, District Judge:
Louis R. Schwartz appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus from the United States Army. The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U. S.C. § 2241. Hammond v. Lenfest, 398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir.1968). Our jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
Schwartz enlisted in the Army Reserves in September, 1965. He signed a contract which said:
“If in any year I fail to perform satisfactorily any of the requirements set forth above, I can be ordered to perform active duty for training for a maximum of 45 days or be reported to *738Selective Service for immediate induction.”
O…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. RobelSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Richard D. Glazier v. Capt. James G. Hackel, Company CommanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Mickey v. BarclayDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Karpinski v. ResorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Mellinger v. LairdDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Silverthorne v. LairdDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.